Kop v. Kalani et al
Fletcher Kop |
Kalum Kalani, K. Estrada, Todd Thomas, Scott Jinbo, M Lopez and S Meiner |
2:2009cv01157 |
June 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Mark E Aspey (PS) |
David G Campbell |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER that the 12 R&R is accepted. The 1 prisoner civil rights complaint is dismissed for failure to serve Defendants and failure to comply with Court orders. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 01/12/10. (ESL) |
Filing 10 ORDER (Service Packet), Defendants Kalani and Jinbo are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Estrada, Thomas, Lopez, and Meiner must answer the Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. #1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Estrada, Thomas, Lopez, and Meiner. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 20 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey added. Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey (PS) no longer assigned to case. Scott Jinbo and Kalum Kalani terminated. Service Packet due by 9/21/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/31/09. (DMT, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.