Shivers v. Phoenix Police Department et al
| Corey Demar Shivers |
| Phoenix Police Department and Tyler Kamp |
| 2:2009cv01243 |
| June 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Jay R Irwin (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER that Plaintiff's Notices are granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 82-84.) The Notices are granted to the extent that Plaintiff seeks clarification and otherwise denied. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/3/11.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER ACCEPTING Judge Irwin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 73) as set forth in this Order and GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 50). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties' other pending motions are DENIED as moot (See Doc. 68, 70). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/9/10. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn solely as to Pla's 20 Motion to Rebuttal [sic] Immunity. Pla's Motion to Rebuttal [sic] Immunity is construed as a motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of April Sponsel as a Dft, which is denied. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/19/09. (ESL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
