Scotti v. City of Phoenix et al
| Glen R Scotti |
| City of Phoenix, City of Phoenix Police Department, Jack Harris, Jane Doe Harris, Mary Freund, John Doe Freund, Christina Gonzalez, John Doe Gonzalez, David Sampson, Jane Doe Sampson, Sandra Renteria and John Doe Renteria |
| 2:2009cv01264 |
| June 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Edward C Voss |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 13 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff's state law claims for malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and defamation are dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's state law claim for gross negligence against Defendants Phoenix Police Department, Freund, Gonzalez, Harris, and Sampson is dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Phoenix Pol ice Department are dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's claims for (1) Malicious Prosecution under 28 U.S.C. 1983 against Defendants City of Phoenix, Mary Freund, Christina Gonzalez, Jack Harris, Sandra Renteria, and David Sampson; and (2) Gross Negligence under state law against Defendants City of Phoenix and Renteria may proceed. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/16/10.(REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
