v. Mace
Plaintiff: Ram Outfitters Ltd.
Defendant: Robert Mace, Gerald Mecham and James Pendergast
Case Number: 2:2009cv01382
Filed: June 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 104 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW finding that Defendant Gerald W. Mecham, Jr. breached the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose as to Plaintiff Ram Head, and awarding $120,149.74 in damages; finding that Defendant Gerald W . Mecham, Jr. breached the implied warranty of merchantability as to Plaintiff Ram Head, and awarding $120,149.74 in damages; finding that Defendant Gerald W. Mecham, Jr. breached its contract with Plaintiff Ram Head, and awarding $120,149. 74 in damages; finding that Defendant Gerald W. Mecham, Jr. did not commit negligent misrepresentation; finding that Defendant Gerald W. Mecham, Jr. committed consumer fraud against Ram Head and awarding $136,372.82 in damages; finding that Defe ndant Robert C. Mace breached his contracts with Ram Head, and awarding $136,372.82 as to the pre-purchase breach, and $122,649.74 as to the export C of A breach; finding that Defendant Robert C. Mace committed professional negligence again st Ram Head and awarding $136,372.82 in damages; finding that Defendant Robert C. Mace committed negligent misrepresentation against Ram Head and awarding $136,372.82; finding that the torts committed against Ram Head by Mecham and Mace cau sed an indivisible injury of $136,372.82, and that Mace is sixty percent (60%) responsible for the injury and that Mecham is forty percent (40%)responsible for the injury; that Defendants are jointly and severally liable for $120,149.74 of the damages awarded on their contract-based claims; directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 04/13/11. (ESL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: v. Mace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Mace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerald Mecham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Pendergast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ram Outfitters Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?