Monje et al v. Spin Master, Inc. et al
| Mark Monje, Beth Monje and Ryan Monje |
| Spin Master, Inc., Spin Master, Ltd., Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc. and Moose Enterprises Pty Ltd. |
| 2:2009cv01713 |
| August 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Personal Injury: Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
ORDER that ESSE and PSL's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 126 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ESSE and PSL from this case. FURTHER ORDERED that ESSE and PSL's Motion to Strike (Doc. 126) is GRANTED. The designation of E SSE and PSL as non-parties at fault in Spin Master's Amended Answer (Doc. 83 44) is hereby stricken. FURTHER ORDERED that BVCPS's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 130 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that BVSA's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 131 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate BVSA from this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Spin Master's Motion (Doc. 160 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/30/2013.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER that Moose's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 85 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Monjes' Motion for Oral Argument (Doc. 125 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/29/2013.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
