Payan et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
Martha E Payan and Xavier Payan |
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, City of, Joshua R Mesquita, Timothy M Wheeler, Eric S Gunnels, Chad Brouwer, Nathan Jordan, Janina Austin and Joseph Congero |
2:2009cv01917 |
September 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
James A Teilborg |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, granted in part with respect to dismissal Plaintiffs' state law claims and with respect to the dismissal of Defendants Nathan Jordan and Joseph Congero from this action. It is denied with respect to Plaintiff Xavier Payan's Section 1983 claim for violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments by Defendants Eric S. Gunnels, Chad Brouwer and Janina Austin. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/4/10.(LSP) |
Filing 48 ORDER - that for purposes of considering the motion to dismiss 47 filed by Austin, Brouwer, Congero, Gunnels, and Jordan, the Court will consider only the claims and allegations preserved in the Amended Complaint 25 . If Plaintiffs wish to proceed on claims or allegations from the original complaint, Plaintiffs must file a motion to amend and, consistent with Local Rule Civil 15.1 attach the proposed amended complaint. Again, this proposed amended complaint must not incorporate by reference any of the prior complaints. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/10/10. (KMG) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss Pla's Amended Complaint as to dfts City of Phoenix and Phoenix Police Department. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/4/10.(LAD) |
Filing 23 ORDER that the motion to amend Doc. # 11 is granted; Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint by December 22, 2009 or this case will be dismissed. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint by January 13, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss Doc. # 9 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 12/11/09.(KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.