Sandoval

Plaintiff: Elaine Sandoval
Defendant: Commisioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2009cv01931
Filed: September 17, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 10, 2011 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Plaintiff's 20 Application for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) is granted; that the Clerk enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Elaine Sandoval in the amount of $5,586.10 to (representing $5,236.10 in attorney's fees and $350 in costs) against Defendant, with interest at the federal judgment rate from the date of entry of judgment. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 03/10/11. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandoval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elaine Sandoval
Represented By: Stephanie Elizabeth Lake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commisioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?