Hill v. Premier Healthcare Services, LLC et al
Darrell James Hill |
Premier Healthcare Services, LLC, Secretary of the Treasury and Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2009cv01956 |
September 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 09/03/10.(ESL) |
Filing 38 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Premier Defendants' 20 Motion for Attorneys Fees is granted in the amount of $8,935. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/13/10. (SAT) |
Filing 36 ORDER denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/14/10.(DMT) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 18 Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case with prejudice. The Premier Defendants' request for attorneys' fees shall be briefed under theschedule set forth in this order, see PDF document for details. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/8/10.(LSP) |
Filing 24 ORDER that Plaintiff's 23 motion for reconsideration is denied. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 04/29/10.(ESL) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting with prejudice 10 Premier Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 8 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time; and denying as moot 14 Plaintiff's Motion for judicial notice. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/7/10.(LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.