Osorio-Hernandez v. Arizona Attorney General, State of

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Osorio-Hernandez v. Arizona Attorney General, State of

Osorio-Hernandez v. Arizona Attorney General, State of

Petitioner:	Marcos Osorio-Hernandez
Respondent:	Arizona Attorney General, State of
Case Number:	2:2009cv02220
Filed:	October 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	David K Duncan (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 1, 2010	Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 20 Report and Recommendation is adopted; the request for writ of habeas corpus is denied; the Clerk shall close this case; a Certificate of Appealabiltiy is denied, dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 11/30/10. (REW)
October 27, 2010	Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 8 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Marcos Osorio-Hernandez be denied and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 10/27/10. (LSP)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 1, 2010

Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 20 Report and Recommendation is adopted; the request for writ of habeas corpus is denied; the Clerk shall close this case; a Certificate of Appealabiltiy is denied, dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 11/30/10. (REW)

October 27, 2010

Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 8 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Marcos Osorio-Hernandez be denied and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 10/27/10. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osorio-Hernandez v. Arizona Attorney General, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Marcos Osorio-Hernandez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Arizona Attorney General, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?