Torrez et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Case Number: 2:2009cv02298
Filed: November 2, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Prisoner - Prison Condition Office
Referring Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2010 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, Torrez' objection to severance is overruled and his 7 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/15/10.(REW)
January 20, 2010 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER this case is severed into individual actions, one for each Plaintiff. The Clerk shall assign a new case number to each new individual action. The Clerk shall file a copy of the present Complaint, and this Order in each new case. The Clerk shall file Plaintiff Torrez's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Torrez's motion for appointment of person to serve process in Plaintiff Torrez's newly assigned case. The individual Plaintiffs must proceed independently from this point and will not be regarded as co- plaintiffs, except upon further order of the Court. This action is dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk shall close the case and enter judgment. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 1/15/10. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torrez et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?