Torrez et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
2:2009cv02298 |
November 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Prisoner - Prison Condition Office |
Michelle H Burns (PS) |
Mary H Murguia |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER, Torrez' objection to severance is overruled and his 7 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/15/10.(REW) |
Filing 5 ORDER this case is severed into individual actions, one for each Plaintiff. The Clerk shall assign a new case number to each new individual action. The Clerk shall file a copy of the present Complaint, and this Order in each new case. The Clerk shall file Plaintiff Torrez's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Torrez's motion for appointment of person to serve process in Plaintiff Torrez's newly assigned case. The individual Plaintiffs must proceed independently from this point and will not be regarded as co- plaintiffs, except upon further order of the Court. This action is dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk shall close the case and enter judgment. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 1/15/10. (LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Torrez et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.