Matthews, et al v. NPMG Acquisition Sub, LLC
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 17, 2012
ORDER denying 73 Motion for Attorney Fees. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/17/12.(LAD)
|September 13, 2011
ORDER granting defendant's 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/13/11.(LAD)
|March 15, 2011
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Vacate Order and Judgment of Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and F.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). (Doc. 24). Plaintiffs' request that the Court's July 30, 2010 Order be vacated is denied. Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1), however, the Clerk of the Court's August 24, 2010 Judgment is vacated, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to reopen this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs must file their First Amended Complaint with thi s Court no later than the close of business on March 22, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiffs fail to file their First Amended Complaint by March 22, 2011, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/15/11.(LAD)
|July 30, 2010
ORDER signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 7/29/10. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 12).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiffs leave to amend their Complaint. Any amended complaint must be received by this Court within fifteen days of the date of this Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiffs Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 16).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiffs Motion to Convert Defendants Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss into a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 18). (KSP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?