Hogan v. Anasazi Foundation

Case Number: 2:2009cv02379
Filed: December 24, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 17, 2010 32 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's 27 Motion to Dismiss Pla's Third Amended Complaint is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla's 24 Third Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment dismissing this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 9/17/10. (SAT)
June 9, 2010 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Dft's Motion 11 to Dismiss Pla's Complaint is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla's First Amended Complaint 17 is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted with leave to amend by June 22, 2010 . If no further amended complaint is filed by June 22, 2010, the Clerk shall then enter judgment dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 6/8/10.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hogan v. Anasazi Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?