Taylor v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| 2:2009cv02393 |
| November 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Consumer Credit Office |
| Neil V Wake |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER - The United States' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The claims asserted against the federal Defendants (the United States, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Education, the Department of the Treasury, and their employees) are dismissed under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction. The motion is denied as moot to the extent it is brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff shall have until May 27, 2011 to show cause why the Court should not dismi ss the claims against Defendants Lamson Junior College, Arizona Education Loan Marketing Corporation, Southwest Student Services Corporation, and their employees. The Clerk is directed to dismiss those defendants and terminate the action without further notice if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/13/11.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER Plaintiff's application for entry of default (Doc. 92) is denied. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or default judgment (Doc. 96) is denied. The time period under Rule 4(m) for service of process on the United States and its agencies is extended to January 21, 2011. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will not extend this deadline absent a showing of good cause. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/22/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER denying 75 Ex Parte Motion to Vacate andSet Aside Order of Dismissal. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/25/10.(MAP)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 52 Defendant Trans Union LLC's Motion to Dismiss with prejudice; granting 55 Defendant Landsafe Credit Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss with prejudice; granting 57 Defendant Kroll Factual Data, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss with prejudice Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/16/10.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER - The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of each motion to dismiss Dkt. ## 52 , 55 , 57 to Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall file a response to each motion by July 2, 2010. Plaintiff is warned that no further extensions will be granted. Plaintiff is further warned that the Court will summarily grant the motions to dismiss if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/14/10. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER that pla shall have until 6/11/10 to file responses to the motions to dismiss 52 , 55 , 57 . Pla is warned that the Court will summarily grant the motions to dismiss if pla fails to comply with this order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/1/10. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER the motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief 15 , 35 , and 42 are granted. The alternative motions for more definite statement are denied as moot. The complaint (Dkt. #1-1 at 5-37) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have until 3/19/10 to file an amended complaint. Defendant Kroll Factual Data, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to name proper party and for improper service 35 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motions to strike 29 , 43 , and 44 are denied. Plaintiff's motions for laches, for summary judgment, and for judgment on the pleadings 44 are denied.Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/25/10.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
