Henderson et al v. Chase Home Finance LLC
| 2:2009cv02461 |
| November 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. Office |
| James A Teilborg |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
ORDER that Defendant's 135 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Mrs. Henderson does not have standing to assert a claim for defamation against Defendant Chase (Count II). She does have standing to ass ert claims for Fraudulent Concealment (Count I); Violations of Arizona Revised Statutes section 44- 1521(Count IV); Fraud (Count V); Negligent Misrepresentation (Count VIII); and Violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (Count III) against Defendant Chase. Further, Plaintiffs cannot recover damages for claims properly belonging to ALS and CLG. The Motion for Summary Judgment is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/11/2012.(LFIG)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 29 Defendant Chase Home Finance LLC's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/21/10.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henderson et al v. Chase Home Finance LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
