Morgal v. Ryan et al

Case Number: 2:2009cv02508
Filed: December 2, 2009
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
Referring Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 20, 2010 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Petitioner's "Motion 6 to Extend Time to File Amended Petition" is granted. Petitioner has 45 days from the filing date of this Order to file an amended petition on a court-approved form. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 45 days from the filing date of this Order, the Clerk of Court must enter, without further notice to Petitioner, a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. Special Prisoner Deadline due by 6/4/2010. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 4/16/10.(KMG)
April 7, 2010 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying as moot 5 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days from the filing date of the Court's February 25, 2010 Order (Doc. #4), the Clerk of Court must enter dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 4/5/10.(LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgal v. Ryan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?