Morgal v. Ryan et al
| 2:2009cv02508 |
| December 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Mary H Murguia |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER Petitioner's "Motion 6 to Extend Time to File Amended Petition" is granted. Petitioner has 45 days from the filing date of this Order to file an amended petition on a court-approved form. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 45 days from the filing date of this Order, the Clerk of Court must enter, without further notice to Petitioner, a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. Special Prisoner Deadline due by 6/4/2010. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 4/16/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying as moot 5 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition. If Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days from the filing date of the Court's February 25, 2010 Order (Doc. #4), the Clerk of Court must enter dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 4/5/10.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morgal v. Ryan et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
