Petersen et al v. EMC Telecom Corporation et al
| 2:2009cv02552 |
| December 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Edward C Voss |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:185 Suit to Compel Arbitration |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Individual Defendants Erik Zeiner, Andrea McCoy, Kenneth McCoy, Nichole Malero, and Marco Arce 22 is denied. The Individual Defendants, however, may again raise their challenge to arbitra tion on a motion for summary judgment. ORDER that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Disposition Against Defendant EMC Telecom Corporation 25 is granted. ORDER that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply 31 is denied as moot Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/16/10.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Petersen et al v. EMC Telecom Corporation et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
