Addy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al
| 2:2009cv02674 |
| December 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| James A Teilborg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss Party; party Dan Sullivan and Virginia Sullivan terminated. Counts One and Two of Plaintiff's Complaint are dismissed with prejudice as to Dan and Virginia Sullivan and the remaining Counts are dismissed as to Dan and Virginia Sullivan for failure to state a claim, with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff shall file his Amended Complaint within 20 days of the date of this Order. The Amended Complaint shall not contain a separate Count for punitive damages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 15 Motion for for Summary Adjudication of Dan and Virginia Sullivan's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/7/10.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Addy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
