DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank v. Gomez et al
| 2:2009cv02681 |
| December 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Neil V Wake |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER that on or before Friday, 10/08/10 at 3:00 p.m. Dft Art Gomez shall produce true and complete copies of all documents that were previously subpoenaed by Pla's counsel and deliver, or have delivered, such documents to David N. Ingrassia; th at on Thursday, 10/14/10 at 10:00 p.m. Dft Art Gomez shall physically appear for his deposition at the office of court reporters Brown & Toleu at their address identified on the subpoena. The deposition shall not exceed seven hours of questioning; th at after Dft Art Gomez has produced all of the subpoenaed documents and completed his deposition, Pla's counsel shall promptly file a notice of compliance so that the $1000.00 bond may be exonerated by subsequent court order; directing the Clerk of the Court to mail a copy of this order to Mr. Art Gomez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 10/06/10. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank v. Gomez et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
