National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Excel Staffing Services, Inc.
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
Excel Staffing Services Incorporated |
Clifford Blake, Green Planet Group Incorporated, Lumea Staffing Incorporated and First Rate Staffing Incorporated |
2:2009mc00087 |
August 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
G Murray Snow |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Granting in part and denying in part Pla's Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 44 ). The Motion is granted to the extent that the hrg will raise similar issues of: (1) any nonexempt monies or personal property belonging to the jg m debtor that is in the possession of the garnishee; (2) any stock or other financial interest owned by the jgm debtor in the garnishee; or (3) any potentially fraudulent transfers to the garnishee from the jgm debtor. The Motion is denied to the ext ent that it requests that other issues raised by its objections to the answers of Lumea Staffing and Green Planet be consolidated with similar issues raised by National Union in its objections to the answers of garnishees Clifford Blake and First Rate.The Motion is also denied to the extent it seeks a continuation of the scheduled hrg. That hrg is set to begin 2/23/2011 at 9:00 a.m.. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/5/11. (SAT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.