Abramo v. Ryan et al

Case Number: 2:2010cv00006
Filed: January 4, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Referring Judge: Jay R Irwin (PS)
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 13, 2011 22 Opinion or Order of the Court MINUTE ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 21 . Based thereon, the petition at docket 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk Of Court will please enter judgment dismissing the petition with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court wi ll not grant the Certificate of Appealability required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), nor will it grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, because dismissal of the petition is clearly warranted by a plain procedural bar, and jurists of reason would not find the procedural bar debatable. If petitioner desires to take an appeal, he must request a Certificate of Appealabilty from the Court of Appeals. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(1). (LAD)
September 29, 2010 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 16 Motion to Seal FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents Proposed Exhibits 17 shall be filed under seal. FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall have fourteen days from the filing of this Order to reply in support of his habeas petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jay R Irwin on 9/28/10.(MAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abramo v. Ryan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?