Govan v. Security National Financial Corporation, et al
| 2:2010cv00057 |
| January 8, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Edward C Voss |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER granting 114 Motion re Garnishment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 117 continuing lien/garnishment. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/19/2013.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER denying 99 Motion for Bond. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/2011.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 84 ) is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/13/11. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 35 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff shall have until 8/6/2010 to file his amended complaint. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/3/2010.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying without prejudice 11 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/23/2010.(NVO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Govan v. Security National Financial Corporation, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
