Balas v. Unknown Party et al

Balas v. Unknown Party et al

Case Number:	2:2010cv00101
Filed:	January 15, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence O Anderson (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 2, 2011	Filing 24 ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's 20 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted by the Court; that the petitioner's [Amended] Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 10) i s denied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice; that no Certificate of Appealability shall issue and that the petitioner is not authorized authorized to appeal in forma pauperis because the dismissal of the petitioner's habeas petitio n is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable, and because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 08/02/11. (ESL)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 2, 2011

Filing 24 ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's 20 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted by the Court; that the petitioner's [Amended] Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 10) i s denied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice; that no Certificate of Appealability shall issue and that the petitioner is not authorized authorized to appeal in forma pauperis because the dismissal of the petitioner's habeas petitio n is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable, and because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 08/02/11. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Balas v. Unknown Party et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?