Sierra-Sonora Enterprises, Inc., et al v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: |
Sierra-Sonora Enterprises, Inc, Jackson Hole Partners, LP and Grand Teton Partners, LP |
Defendant: |
Domino's Pizza, LLC, TISM, Inc. and Unknown Parties |
Case Number: |
2:2010cv00105 |
Filed: |
January 19, 2010 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Office: |
Phoenix Division Office |
County: |
Maricopa |
Presiding Judge: |
James A Teilborg |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Contract |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 4, 2010 |
Filing
64
ORDER granting 38 Defendants' Renewed Motion to Dismiss. Domino's Pizza, Inc. is dismissed from this action, and Plaintiffs' remaining claim is against Domino's Pizza, LLC for breach of written contract; denying 42 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Couterclaim of Counterdefendants Sierra-Sonora Enterprises, Inc., Rick Flory, and Lee Robert. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/3/10.(TLJ)
|
May 4, 2010 |
Filing
21
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss as follows: Defendants motion to dismiss is denied as to Count One; Defendants motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts Two through Six; Defendants motion to dismiss is granted as to Plaintiffs claim for punitive damages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs have 30 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified herein. If Plaintiffs fail to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of the Court shall, without further Court order, dismiss with prejudice Plaintiffs claims in Counts Two through Six, as well as Plaintiffs claim for punitive damages. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/4/10.(LAD)
|
February 10, 2010 |
Filing
15
ORDER that by 02/24/10, Dft Domino's Pizza LLC shall file an amended notice of removal properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be remanded for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dft is cautioned that it will be given one opportunity to amend to cure the jurisdictional allegations. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 02/10/10. (NOTE: See attached pdf for complete details) (ESL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?