Alvarez v. Maricopa County et al
Plaintiff: Celia A Alvarez
Defendant: Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio, Ava Arpaio and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2010cv00310
Filed: February 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER, granting Arpaio Defendants' 92 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting Defendant Maricopa County's 95 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing Count 3 and Count 4 of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; dismissing Count 1 and Count 2 of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as the Court will exercise its discretion not to consider these state law claims. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 8/25/11.(REW)
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss Case; granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss Case. Plaintiff's request to amend is granted. Plaintiff's requests for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(f) are denied. Plaintiff's motion for order authorizing alternative service 20 is denied. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before 7/16/2010. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/23/2010.(NVO)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarez v. Maricopa County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Celia A Alvarez
Represented By: N Patrick Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa, County of
Represented By: Sherle Rubin Flaggman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio
Represented By: Timothy James Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ava Arpaio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?