Dixon v. Pinal, County of, et al
| Mark E Dixon |
| Bryan Martyn, Pinal, County of, James Walsh, Paul Babeu, Pete Rios and David Snider |
| 2:2010cv00325 |
| February 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER denying 122 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/11/12.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER denying 98 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 107 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/7/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting in part and denying in part as set forth in this order 61 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The deadlines set forth in the case management order dated 10/13/10 (Doc. 57) remain in effect. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/11/11.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying 66 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/7/11.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting Pla's 26 Motion to Dismiss Party/Dfts. Defendants David Snider, Bryan Martyn and Pete Rios are dismissed. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for August 6, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. (Dkt. #29). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/14/10.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
