Diners Club International, Ltd. v. Poole, et al
| Diners Club International, Ltd. |
| Gwen D Cash, Unknown Cash, Arvin Poole, Unknown Poole, SHAARP Ventures, LLC, GDCash, LLC and GDC Enterprises |
| 2:2010cv00400 |
| February 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James A Teilborg |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER, granting Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Related Non-Taxable Costs; Awarding $7,633.56 in non-taxable costs and $43,984.76 in attorneys' fees to Plaintiff Diners Club International Ltd against Defendants Arvin Poole and SHAARP Ventures LLC, d/b/a SHAARP Hosting; the Clerk shall enter judgment against the Defendants Arvin Poole and SHAARP Ventures LLC, d/b/a SHAARP Hosting accordingly. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/19/11.(REW)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 25 Motion to extend time to serve Jane Doe Poole; Jane Doe Poole is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to timely serve; within 30 days Plaintiff shall either move for default judgment with respect to the remaining Defendants or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/1/10.(REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
