Plaza 75 Shopping Center, LLC v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
| Plaza 75 Shopping Center, LLC |
| Big Lots Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00592 |
| March 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| David G Campbell |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER that Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees and costs (Doc. 56 ) is granted in part. Defendants are awarded attorneys' fees and costs of $26,114.00. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/21/2012.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying without prejudice 49 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/7/2011.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) is granted. Pla's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied as moot. The Clerk shall enter jgm in favor of Dft and terminate this action. If Dft seeks to recover attys' fees in light of this ruling, it shall file a memorandum and supporting factual material by 1/28/2011, rather than following the briefing schedule set forth in LRCiv 54.2. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/7/11. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER that Pla's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 16(f), doc. 24, is GRANTED in part. Pla is awarded the sum of $875.00 in attorneys' fees, all of which were incurred after Friday, July 23, 2010. The Court finds the sum of $8 75.00 in attorneys' fees for the work performed related to the settlement conference and the hourly rate of $250.00 per hour are reasonable. Pla's request for reimbursement of the cost of the airfare in the sum of $179.40, incurre d on June 28, 2010, is DENIED because it was incurred before Friday, July 23, 2010 and there has been no showing that this Southwest Airlines' ticket may not be reused or credited to a later flight. FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by Judge Campbell, the fees awarded herein shall not be paid until the prevailing party is determined at the conclusion of this case and the fees awarded herein shall then be added to, or reduced from, the prevailing party's attorneys' fees without duplication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/27/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying as moot 21 Motion for Relief from Settlement Conference Order Regarding Physical Appearance. ORDERED that the settlement conference currently scheduled for 8/6/10 at 2:00 p.m. is hereby VACATED. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 7/30/10.(LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Plaza 75 Shopping Center, LLC v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Plaza 75 Shopping Center, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Big Lots Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Bryan Iannelli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
