Murrieta-Perez v. United States of America
||Jesus A Murrieta-Perez
||United States of America
||March 18, 2010
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||James A Teilborg
|Nature of Suit:
||Motions to Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2255
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 7, 2010
ORDER - that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. #1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/6/10. (KMG)
|May 7, 2010
ORDER the Clerk shall deliver copies of 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) Re: Doc. #57 in Criminal Case No CR 08-00712-PHX-JAT, and this Order to the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. Within 60 days from th e date of service of the § 2255 Motion, the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona must answer the Motion. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/6/10. (LSP)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?