Oldenburg v. Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, et al
Kurt Adam Oldenburg |
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and Maricopa County Correctional Health Services |
2:2010cv00656 |
March 31, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Mark E Aspey (PS) |
Paul G Rosenblatt |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 ORDER pursuant to 111 Stipulation of Dismissal: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/4/13. (LAD) |
Filing 110 ORDER - Accordingly, the court DENIES "Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Denial of their Motions in limine No. 1 and 2 as Moot" (Doc. 109) at 1:12-14 (emphasis omitted). Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 1/10/13. (LAD) |
Filing 106 ORDER - (1) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Doc. 87) is denied in part and granted in part; (2) Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 1 (Doc. 94) is denied as moot; (3) Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 2 (Doc. 95) is denied as moot; and IT I S FURTHER ORDERED: (4) setting this case for a jury trial on Monday, March 4, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. in COURTROOM 606, Sixth Floor, Sandra Day OConnor United States Courthouse, 401 West WashingtonStreet, Phoenix, Arizona; COUNSEL SHALL APPEAR AT 8:30 A.M. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 12/4/12. (LAD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.