United States of America v. Direct Marketing Associates, Corp., et al.
| United States of America |
| John M Rainey, Jr. and Direct Marketing Associates, Corp. |
| 2:2010cv00696 |
| March 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Lawrence O Anderson |
| Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the stay of this action, entered herein on April 7, 2010, doc. 9, is hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Approve Stipulated Final Judgment, doc. 21, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter the separate Stipulated Judgment and terminate this case. (See document for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 2/16/11. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER withdrawing without prejudice 4 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment; granting 6 Motion to Withdraw 4 Consent MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment and Order for Civil Penalties, Permanent Injunction, and Other Equitable Relief and granting [6 ] Motion to Stay, Stay Deadline set for 10/4/2010. See PDF document for details. Plaintiff shall file a Status Report on or before Monday, October 4, 2010, failure to comply with may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 4/7/10.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
