Stewart v. Bank of New York Mellon et al

Plaintiff: Rosemary Stewart
Defendant: First Capital Lending, Inc., Litton Loan Servicing LP, Bank of New York Mellon and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Case Number: 2:2010cv00791
Filed: April 9, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 21, 2012 116 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE any and all claims with all parties to bear their respective costs and attorney's fees re Stipulation 115 . Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/21/12. (TLJ)
July 29, 2011 54 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 49 Motion For Leave To Amend Complaint. Directing Plaintiff to file her Second Amended Complaint. Granting in part and denying in part Defendant Mellon and Litton's 28 Motion To Dismiss as it pertains to the S econd Amended Complaint. Specifically, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted as to both Defendants on counts one, two, four, five, six, nine and ten of the SAC. The motion is also granted on counts three and seven of the SAC as to Litton only. Defendants Motion is denied as to count eight as to both Defendants, and denied as to Defendant Mellon on counts three, and seven of the SAC. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 07/29/11. (ESL)
September 22, 2010 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Litton's 6 Motion to Dismiss is granted with leave to amend; that the Bank of New York's 16 Motion to Dismiss is granted with leave to amend; that Plaintiff has, to and including, 10/22/10, to file a First Amended Complaint; if Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within the time stated, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action, without further notice. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 09/22/10. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Capital Lending, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Litton Loan Servicing LP
Represented By: Ryan Shawn Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Ryan Shawn Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quality Loan Service Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosemary Stewart
Represented By: Barry Wayne Rorex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?