Gallegos v. Arizona, State of et al
| Arthur Charles Gallegos |
| Marty Soto, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Maricopa County Superior Court, Southport Probation Department and Luigi Patruno |
| 2:2010cv00867 |
| April 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Mary H Murguia |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is denied (Doc. 19 ). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 2/4/11. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER The First Amended Petition doc.# 4 and this action are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner's motion 5 for order to show cause is denied. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 6/9/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER, the Petition 1 is dismissed for failure to allege facts to support that Petitioner was "in custody" under his Maricopa County conviction or sentence when he commenced this case and to name his custodian as a respondent; Petitioner has 30 days to file a first amended petition in compliance with this Order; if Petitioner fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 5/3/10. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
