Cypert v. Ryan et al
| Michael Aaron Cypert |
| Ralph Cluff, Dave Vicklund and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2010cv00878 |
| April 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Jay R Irwin (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER that pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/18/10. (LSP)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER (Service Packet) - Count III of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 9) is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant Ralph Cluff is dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Amended Complaint (Doc. 9), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Charles L. Ryan and Dave Vicklund. This matter is referred to Magistr ate Judge Jay R. Irwin pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (See document for full details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/23/10. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
