Rhodes v. Internal Revenue Service et al
| Steven I Rhodes |
| Internal Revenue Service, Douglas Schulman and Deborah Morales |
| 2:2010cv01074 |
| May 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and finding as moot 26 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/10/11.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 20 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/8/11.(NVO)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Plaintiff's 11 motion for leave to file a reply is granted. Defendants' 7 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part as stated. Plaintiff's 8 motion for default judgment is denied. Plaintiff shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1) by properly serving the United States Attorney General and the United States Attorney for Arizona, and shall file a Certificate of Service with this Court by 01/21/11. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/27/10. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 10 Motion to Continue. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 7) by December 10, 2010. Defendants may file a reply by December 17, 2010. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/24/10.(DMT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
