Crosby v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 23, 2010
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) byAegis Mortgage Corporation, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Aurora LoanServicing, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., McCarthy, Holthus & Levine and Paul M. Levine is granted, dismissing the Complaint with prejudice as to these Defendants as res judicata. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 (Doc. 8) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defend ants' Motion to Preclude Future Filings by Plaintiff (Doc. 7) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) by Defendants Pinal County Recorder, Laura Dean-Lytle, and Pinal County Sheriff, Paul Babeau, is granted, dismissing the Complaint with prejudice as to these Defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) by the Honorable Robert Carter Olson and the Honorabl e Gilbert V. Figueroa will be granted, dismissing the Complaint with prejudice as to these Defendants under the doctrine of judicial immunity.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Cease andDesist Foreclosure Proceedings (Doc. 6) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk shall enter Judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. The Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 7/23/10.(LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?