Lundergan et al v. Arizona, State of, et al
Plaintiff: Robert Lundergan and Darlene Lundergan
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Economic Security and Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration
Case Number: 2:2010cv01211
Filed: June 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pima
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER that Plas' 17 Amended Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Stay of Administrative Decision and Dfts' 11 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED without prejudice; that Dfts' 11 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice with respect to Plas' claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and DENIED without prejudice with respect to the Medicaid Act claim; that this action is STAYED pending the completion of state administrative proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing Plas' counsel to file a Status Report on or before 10/25/10, and every 90 days thereafter until the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 07/26/10. (ESL)
July 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 AMENDED ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion Doc. 2 for a Temporary Restraining Order and Stay of Administrative Decision is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/12/10. (KMG)
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER that Plaintiffs' Motion 2 for a Temporary Restraining Order and Stay of Administrative Decision is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/11/10. (NOTE: See Order for full details)(KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lundergan et al v. Arizona, State of, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lundergan
Represented By: Robert Miles Gregory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darlene Lundergan
Represented By: Robert Miles Gregory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Department of Economic Security
Represented By: Nicole Clarissa Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration
Represented By: Timothy Daniel Ducar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?