UV2, LLC v. EMC Telecom Corporation
| UV2 LLC |
| EMC Telecom Corporation |
| 2:2010cv01269 |
| June 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Other Contract |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED the Motions for Expedited Ruling (Doc. 97 , 98 ) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Reports and Recommendations (Doc. 93 and 94 ) are ADOPTED IN FULL. The objections to the answers (Doc. 67, 75) are SUSTAINED. Plainti ff shall submit a proposed form of judgment within thirty days of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 92 ) is ADOPTED IN PART. The Applications for a Writ of Garnishment (Doc. 51 , 52 ) are stayed until the conc lusion of the state court proceedings (Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, UV2, LLC v. Digital Ventures, LLC, CV-2009-054788). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED UV2, LLC, Double D Holdings, LLC, and Pink Bird Media, Inc. shall file a joint status report regarding the state case ninety days from the date of this Order and every ninety days thereafter. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 7/29/13. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
94
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 67 Objection to Garnishee WMM Holdings, LLC's Answer. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Objection to Garnishee WMM Holdings, LLC's Answer, (Doc. 67 ), be SUSTAINED, and judgment be entered ag ainstGarnishee WMM Holdings, LLC. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Court order Plaintiff to submit a proposed form of judgment within 30-days of the Court's final order. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 5/20/13. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 . The Writ of Garnishment against Garnishee Digital Venture's LLC is valid, that Plaintiff's Objection to Garnishee's Answer is granted, and that Garnishee is indebted to Defendant/Judgmen t-Debtor EMC Telecom Corporation ("EMC") in an amount exceeding the balance owed on Plaintiff's Judgment against EMC. That the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor UV2, LLC and against Garnish ee Digital Ventures, LLC for the principal sum of $602,753.55 and that interest shall accrue on the foregoing sum at the rate of 0.18% per annum from the date of this Judgment until it is fully paid. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 12/12/12. (DMT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UV2, LLC v. EMC Telecom Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UV2 LLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven Charles Lawrence |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EMC Telecom Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
