Chocolates by Bernard, LLC et al v. Chocolaterie Bernard Callebaut LTD et al
||Chocolates by Bernard LLC and Murray Kuzek
||Chocolaterie Bernard Callebaut Limited, Chocolates by Bernard Callebaut Limited, Bernard C. Chocolates Limited, Chocolate Man, Bernard Callebaut, Francesca Callebaut and Unknown Parties
||June 18, 2010
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||John W Sedwick
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 29, 2013
ORDER AND OPINION denying 65 Motion to Amend Complaint. The court finds no just reason for delay in the entry of a judgment that Plaintiffs take nothing from Defendants Bernard Callebaut and Francesca Callebaut, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment for Defendants Bernard Callebaut and Francesca Callebaut pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 14 days from this order, Plaintiffs shall show good cause why their claims against CBC should not be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 8/28/13.(LSP)
|July 11, 2013
ORDER AND OPINION granting 50 Defendants' Motion, which the court has treated as a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff's second, fourth, and fifth claims are dismissed. In addition, the Defendants objection at Doc. 67 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint at Doc. 65 has yet to be fully briefed and remains to be decided. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 7/11/13.(LSP)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?