Corbin, et al. v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.
| Toby Harris, Unknown Parties, Christopher Flournoy, Benny U Henriksen, Alan Reeser and Casey Corbin |
| GoDaddy.com, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv01313 |
| June 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER GRANTING the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 108 .) Counts I and II of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 35) are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursu ant to this Stipulation of Dismissal, Plaintiffs Casey Corbin, Christopher Flournoy, Benny Henriksen and Alan Reeser no longer have any further claims in this action and are therefore stricken from the caption of this case. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/21/2012. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20) is GRANTED. Counts one and two are dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint within 15 days of the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/2/11.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
