Hubbs v Houser
Petitioner: James J Hubbs
Respondent: Robert C Houser, Terry Goddard and Steve Sparks
Case Number: 2:2010cv01318
Filed: June 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Lawrence O Anderson (PS)
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER ACCEPTING 36 Judge Anderson's Report and Recommendation. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 9) is denied and also denying 31 Motion for Hearing or Conference re: Oral Argument. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Since the Court ruled on the merits of the constitutional claim as well as the procedural issue, it declines to issue a Certificate of Appeal (COA) because reasonable jurists would not "find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/13/12. (LSP)
November 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 11 Petitioner's requests in his pleading entitled "Notice Of Filing Of First Amended Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus[;] Request To Vacate Dismissal Order[;] Request To Direct Clerk To Serve Petition On Attorney General Of The State Of Arizona[;] Request That The Court Order A Response To The Petition". Respondents Robert C. Houser and Steve Sarkis are dismissed without prejudice from this action. The Clerk must serve a copy of 9 Amended Petition and this Order on the Respondent Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, by certified mail. Respondent Terry Goddard must answer the Amended Petition within 40 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/4/10.(LSP)
August 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that the Petition is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal without prejudice if Petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/4/10. (LSP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hubbs v Houser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James J Hubbs
Represented By: W Clifford Girard, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert C Houser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Terry Goddard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?