Cabrera-Gonzalez v. Holder

Petitioner: Jose Everardo Cabrera-Gonzalez
Respondent: Eric H Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2010cv01368
Filed: July 2, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: David K Duncan (PS)
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 30, 2010 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 3) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) and this action are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/30/10.(KMG) .

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cabrera-Gonzalez v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Everardo Cabrera-Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric H Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Cynthia M Parsons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?