Combs et al v. State Farm Insurance Companies et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 30, 2012
ORDER DENYING in part and granting in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43 ). DENYING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' claim for breach of contract on the issue of non-payment of ALE Benefits . GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' claim for breach of contract on the issue of non-payment of code upgrade payments. DENYING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' claim for ba d faith. GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages. FURTHER ORDERED setting the Final Pretrial Conference for November 19, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. The deadline for the parties to file dispositiv e motions has passed. This matter appearing ready for trial, a Final Pretrial Conference shall be held in Courtroom 605, Sandra Day OConnor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003. FURTHER ORDERED that, if this case shall be tried to a jury, the attorneys who will be responsible for the trial of the lawsuit shall prepare and sign a Proposed Pretrial Order and submit it to the Court on Friday, October 26, 2012. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/30/2012. (NOTE: See PDF for full details.)(KMG)
|July 21, 2010
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that State Farm submit additional evidence byAugust 4, 2010, to establish that removal is proper. Plaintiffs will then have until August 18, 2010, to respond. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 7/21/10. (LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?