Orozco v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 7, 2012
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report and Recommendation 25 is accepted in part and modified in part as specified in this order; Petitioner's Objections 38 are overruled, the Petition is denied and dismissed, with prejudice, and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly; Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Proceedings 39 and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 23 are denied as unnecessary; Petitioner's Motion to file an amended habeas petition 24 is denie d as futile because it does not raise any new issues relevant to the timeliness of the petition; Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance 22 is denied because the statute of limitations has already run and stay and abeyance is appropriate whe re Petitioner has good cause for failing to exhaust claims in state court and the claims have merit; a Certificate of Appealability is denied because dismissal of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 2/7/12. (REW)
|August 24, 2010
ORDER that Petitioner's 3 Motion For Appointment Of Counsel and 4 Motion For Court Appointed Interpreter are both denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent and th e Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey on 08/23/10. (ESL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?