Abarah v. Scottsdale Police Department et al
Plaintiff: George Abarah
Defendant: Scottsdale Police Department and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Case Number: 2:2010cv01539
Filed: July 21, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 44 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/31/11.(DMT)
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's motion to recuse and clarification of defendants (Doc. 37 ) is denied. Plaintiffs motion for discovery (Doc. 38 ) is denied as moot. Plaintiff shall not file further motions to reconsider the Court's orders denying recusal and dismissing MCSO. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/3/11. (SAT)
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER denying 33 Motion for Recusal ; denying 34 Motion to Alter. The Court will enter a Case Management Order separately. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/24/11.(DMT)
December 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Pla's motion to clarify list of dfts (Doc. 29) is denied to the extent he seeks to amend the original complaint (Doc. 1) to add dfts. The original complaint (Doc. 1) is the operative complaint in this action. The "Response" filed on November 25, 2010 (Doc. 20) does not constitute an amended complaint. The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office has been dismissed as a defendant. Docs. 19, 28. The City of Scottsdale Police Department is the only Dft in this case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/20/10.(KMG)
December 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying 24 Motion to Appoint federal prosecutor. On or before December 30, 2010, Plaintiff shall file with the Court a memorandum stating whether he intends to continue with the prosecution of this case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/9/10.(DMT) Modified on 12/9/2010 (DMT). (see order for full details)
October 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss defendant Maricopa County Sheriff's Office for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying as moot 16 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by November 12, 2010. The Court will set a case management conference by separate order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/18/10.(DMT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abarah v. Scottsdale Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Abarah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scottsdale Police Department
Represented By: Eric C Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Represented By: J Scott Dutcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?