Coleman v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated et al

Plaintiff: Gary Coleman
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, Provident Funding Associates LP, MAX Default Services Corporation, Security Title Agency Incorporated, Michael Proctor, Unknown Proctor, Jason Cotton, Unknown Cotton and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2010cv01549
Filed: July 22, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 21, 2012 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Defendants Provident Funding Associates, LP and Max Default Services Corporation's 6 Motion to Quash Lis Pendens is granted as follows:The lis pendens recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder on October 14, 2009 as document no. 2009-0950914 is quashed. The lis pendens recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder on January 8, 2010 as document no. 2010-0015786 is quashed. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants's 8 Request for Summary Disposition is denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED The Clerk of the Court shall file a copy of this Order in MDL 09-2119-PHX-JAT and CV 10-1549-PHX-JAT. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/21/12.(MAP)
July 22, 2010 1 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting/denying in parte Motion to Remand Certain Claims (Doc. #457, in MDL-2119). ORDERED that with respect to Coleman (CV 10-200), claim 1 (breach of contract), claim 4 (quite title), claim 7 (invalid deed of trust), claim 8 (intentional inf liction of emotional distress), claim 9 (fraud - misrepresentation and conspiracy), claim 10 (conversion/theft), claim 11 (uniform commercial code), and claim 12 (civil RICO) remain with the undersigned as part of the MDL; claim 2 (Arizona consumer f raud act), claim 3 (home ownership equity protection act), and claim 6 (fair debt collection practices act) are remanded to Judge Silver; to accomplish the bifurcation of this case within this district, the Clerk of the Court is directed to bifurcate Coleman into two cases; the Clerk of the Court shall draw and assign a new Phoenix case number to the portion of the Coleman case that is remaining with the undersigned and the Clerk of the Court shall consolidate that case number into the MDL as a member case. The Clerk of the Court shall transfer theoriginal Coleman case number back to Judge Silver...See Order for Full Details. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/22/10. (Original Order filed in MDL-2119 (Doc. 964)) (MAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated
Represented By: Robert M Brochin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Provident Funding Associates LP
Represented By: William Morris Fischbach, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAX Default Services Corporation
Represented By: William Morris Fischbach, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Security Title Agency Incorporated
Represented By: Robert C Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Proctor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Proctor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Cotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Cotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?