Vance v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Christopher Vance
Defendant: Zicam LLC, Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Zicam Swab Products LLC and Botanical Laboratories Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2010cv01637
Filed: August 3, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Frederick J Martone
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 24, 2011 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part (Doc. 1162) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case For Plaintiffs' Failure To Comply With Court-Ordered Discovery filed in Lead Case Number 2:09-md-2096-FJM. IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendants' mot ion as to plaintiffs Christopher Vance, Glen Dunn, and Russell Hill. IT IS ORDERED DENYING defendants' motion as to plaintiffs Mahieddine Adjal, Joseph DAmico, Jr., Krista Edwards, Kevin Murray, Diane Nygard, Joseph Rubbo, and Carl Schnabl. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DISMISSING with prejudice Member Case Number CV-10-1637. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 2/24/11. (LSP)
November 19, 2010 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting (Doc. 1051, filed in MDL-2096) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Thomas P Cartmell and Christopher L Schnieders withdrawn as counsel for plaintiff Christopher Vance. All future notice to plaintiff Christopher Vance shall be to the address listed in the motion. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 11/19/10. (Original Order filed in MDL-2096, Doc. 1161) (MAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vance v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Vance
Represented By: Thomas P Cartmell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zicam LLC
Represented By: Madeleine M McDonough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated
Represented By: Madeleine M McDonough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zicam Swab Products LLC
Represented By: Madeleine M McDonough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Botanical Laboratories Incorporated
Represented By: Madeleine M McDonough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?