Vance v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
Christopher Vance |
Zicam LLC, Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Zicam Swab Products LLC and Botanical Laboratories Incorporated |
2:2010cv01637 |
August 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Frederick J Martone |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting in part and denying in part (Doc. 1162) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case For Plaintiffs' Failure To Comply With Court-Ordered Discovery filed in Lead Case Number 2:09-md-2096-FJM. IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendants' mot ion as to plaintiffs Christopher Vance, Glen Dunn, and Russell Hill. IT IS ORDERED DENYING defendants' motion as to plaintiffs Mahieddine Adjal, Joseph DAmico, Jr., Krista Edwards, Kevin Murray, Diane Nygard, Joseph Rubbo, and Carl Schnabl. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DISMISSING with prejudice Member Case Number CV-10-1637. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 2/24/11. (LSP) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting (Doc. 1051, filed in MDL-2096) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Thomas P Cartmell and Christopher L Schnieders withdrawn as counsel for plaintiff Christopher Vance. All future notice to plaintiff Christopher Vance shall be to the address listed in the motion. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 11/19/10. (Original Order filed in MDL-2096, Doc. 1161) (MAP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.