Vitasek v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
| Arthur L Vitasek |
| R Gilbert, Deana Lopez and Joseph M Arpaio |
| 2:2010cv01777 |
| August 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Jay R Irwin |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 64 and Motion for Ruling 70 . Defendants' Motion for Ruling 70 is denied. Plaintiff's request to consider response as timely fi led (within Doc. 71) is denied. Defendants' Motion to Strike (within Doc. 73) is denied. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 64 is granted. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accrodingly and terminate the action. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 1/23/12.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Gilbert and Lopez' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Court Orders (Doc. 27 ). Gilbert and Lopez' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23 ) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Court Orders (Doc. 27 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/31/11. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER (Service Packet) - IT IS ORDERED: Pla's 3 MOTION (Application) to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. Pla must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $5.67. Dft Maricopa County Sheriff� 39;s Office is dismissed without prejudice. Dft Gilbert must answer Count One of the Complaint and Dft Lopez must answer Count Two of the Complaint.The Clerk of Court must send Pla a service packet including the 1 Complaint, this Order, and both su mmons and request for waiver forms for Dfts Gilbert and Lopez. Pla must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. Dfts must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriat e motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/31/10. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
