Kane et al v. Bosco et al
| Peter M Kane and Diane M Kane |
| R K Arnold, Thomas E Prince, Richard Davis, William G Roehrenbeck, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, Michael A Bosco, Jr, Central Mortgage Company, U.S. Bancorp and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2010cv01787 |
| August 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Pls' Motion to Remand (Doc. # 14 ) is DENIED.FURTHER ORDERED that Dfts' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. # 8 , 9 & 11 ) are GRANTED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Dfts Michael A. Bosco, Jr.'s, Central M ortgage Company's and MERS's request for an award of attys' fees and costs is DENIED without prejudice. Consistent with this Order, Dfts may file a motion for attys' fees and costs in accordance with Local Rule 54.2. FINALLY ORDE RED that Plas have 21 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified herein. If Plas fail to file an amended complaint within 21 days, the Clerk of the Court shall, without further Court order, enter jgm in favor of Dfts. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/23/10. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the 20 Emergency Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction is denied. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/10/10. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
