Najar v. Ryan et al

Petitioner:	William Franklin Najar
Respondent:	Charles L Ryan and Terry L Goddard
Case Number:	2:2010cv01981
Filed:	September 15, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Susan R Bolton
Presiding Judge:	Mark E Aspey
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 18, 2013	Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, overruling Petitioner's 29 Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation; adopting the Magistrate Judge's 21 Report and Recommendation as supplemented by this Order; denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/17/13. (REW)
August 8, 2011	Filing 22 ORDER adopting the 21 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court; that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered denying any Certificate of Appealability a nd leave to proceedin in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253(c)(2). it is further ordered directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 08/08/11. (ESL)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 18, 2013

Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, overruling Petitioner's 29 Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation; adopting the Magistrate Judge's 21 Report and Recommendation as supplemented by this Order; denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/17/13. (REW)

August 8, 2011

Filing 22 ORDER adopting the 21 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court; that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered denying any Certificate of Appealability a nd leave to proceedin in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253(c)(2). it is further ordered directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 08/08/11. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Najar v. Ryan et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William Franklin Najar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Represented By:	Adriana Marie Rosenblum
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Terry L Goddard
Represented By:	Adriana Marie Rosenblum
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?