In Re: Oladiran
United States of America |
2:2010cv02020 |
February 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER - 1. The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that attorney Tajudeen Oladiran has violated Ethical Rules 1.1, 1.3, 3.1, 3.5(d), 4.4(a) and 8.4(d). 2. Mr. Oladiran is suspended from the practice of law before this Court for six months. T his suspension shall run from October 1, 2010, to April 1, 2011. 3. The Court anticipates that judges of this Court in any cases where Mr. Oladiran currently is appearing will afford him and his clients reasonable time to arrange substitute counsel. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/21/10. (LAD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In Re: Oladiran | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Amicus: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Peter Michael Lantka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.